Legal Ombudsman names all firms subject to complaints
15th Jun 2016
The Legal Ombudsman received complaints about 1,673 firms and individuals during the last financial year, the organisation revealed in its annual name-and-shame list. The LeO is empowered to publish information on decisions by the 2007 Legal Services Act and it aims to help raise standards across the legal sector.
The alphabetical list names all firms and individuals that were subject to an investigation, those where a remedy was required and details of what that remedy was.
Direct access barrister Tariq Rehman was the most-complained-about lawyer in the year ending 31 March 2016, with 39 complaints, each requiring a remedy to his client.
According to this year’s figures, Bradford firm Allerton Kaye and south-west London practice Keppe & Partners were the most complained about law firms, with 14 complaints each. In both cases, a remedy was required on 13 occasions.
The highest number of investigations involved national firms Irwin Mitchell (16) and Slater and Gordon (15).
The majority of firms involved in decisions faced just a single complaint through the year. Where there was no remedy required, the ombudsman was satisfied the customer service was adequate or the remedy already offered by the law firm was reasonable.
For the first time, the LeO also published details of claims management companies subject to complaints.
Between 28 January 2015 (when it assumed responsibility for CMC complaints-handling) and 31 March 2016, 88 companies were investigated, requiring 394 decisions.
PPI claims company Rock Law Limited, subject to a record £570,000 fine by the regulator last October, was subject to 165 decisions, with remedies required in 162 of those cases.
The ombudsman has committed to reduce spending by a further £500,000 in the next financial year as the number of cases continues to fall to an expected 6,500, down from a peak of 8,055 in 2013/14.
Legal expenditure is due to be set at £11.7m for 2016/17, down from £12.2m in the current year.